And second, Satprem’s
exhortation does nothing but strengthen the ego of the instrument,
a pitfall of yoga that Sri Aurobindo has detailed extensively in his
writings on yoga. It can be succinctly conveyed as follows: It is not
what you build but the consciousness of the builder; it is YOUR
consciousness alone that matters, not the Mother’s Vision.
In 1974, when offered the choice between the Mother’s Vision and Satprem’s, the builders of the Matrimandir chose the latter. This act
of choosing had grave consequences as revealed in the document
on page 4.
Apart from the building itself, the next decisive ‘choice’ after that
1974 turning point was when the community, in an entirely misguided
movement led by the same people involved in the temple issue, opted for
Government control of the project, and finally a complete take-over. Auroville now belongs to the Government of India, a development totally
against the Mother’s will and known to all those who spearheaded the
drive into Government’s arms. That Divine Will was emphatically spelled
out in the two letters we reproduce here. No amount of sophistry will
alter in any way the Mother’s express will in this crucial matter.
This is a coherent process. The choice of the temple plays itself out
almost immediately in vital areas of the project’s life, guided by the
same choice made for the Inner Chamber and, incredibly, spearheaded by
the very same people. All the way down the line decisions must be
influenced by the central symbol, the focus of the community’s life. It
cannot be otherwise because it is the Law.
Let us see how this
works because in the process it will reveal the greatness of the Mother
and how faithful and true she was to who she was.
Matrimandir Action Committee
February 18, 2003